tellmeoflegends:
scrumptiousconnoisseurdreamer:
Wrote a whole essay trying to prove that Tripitaka is actually the brand new god of hope…and somehow convinced myself she’s a demon.
Stupid brain.
http://fossickbookreviews.blogspot.com.au/2018/03/who-is-tripitaka.html
Very interesting! I’ve always wondered about Tripitaka being more than what she seems, in terms of powers/gifts. She’s pure of heart, which is why she can wield the Crown Sutra. And yes, there’s the argument that she’s lying by pretending to be a boy, but she’s in disguise to save the world, therefore she has good intentions, therefore she’s pure.
As for the power of ‘hope’, this is a very important power. The world hasn’t had strong hope in ages. But it’s still there! Represented by Monica’s small altar, by the small pockets of the Resistance, our young monk. ‘Don’t let hope die’, charges The Scholar. ‘Don’t die’, orders a concerned Monkey as he sits next to an ill Tripitaka.
Could she be a demon? Maybe. But what if she’s a demigod? Her mother mortal, her father not, and who better to raise/train the future hope against the demons than The Scholar? And if she’s to be kept hidden, why not have her ‘disguised’ as just another student, or servant, at the school, learning alongside the boy who /thinks/ he’s to be Tripitaka, when it was her all along?
If it’s this route, it’s very Hercules/Chiron. The wise man teaching the young demigod who is the hope of the world.
Just a thought.
Oh yeah, I’m very into the idea of Tripitaka being more than human. Not a pure god because that creates some plot-holes (if she were a pure god like the others, she’d have been trapped by the Shaman at the Breaking Grounds) but either a demi-god or demon fits in perfectly with the story so far.
A demi-god, like you said, would be interesting because it would imply that Tripitaka is and always has been the true Tripitaka. I’ve got a post somewhere about how Gaxin could have been a (knowing and consenting) decoy for her, but he and the Scholar died before they could enlighten her to her true destiny. (Though the Scholar might have been trying with his last words, he was just muddled by blood loss and not very clear).
A demon would be interesting because it would explore the idea of destiny as a choice. As in, Tripitaka actively defying what people think her destiny should be (wreaking despair, destruction and evil upon the world) to be the person she wants to be (a literal figure of hope). It would also present evil as a choice rather than an inherent nature. Ie, Davari could have chosen to be Monkey’s friend for real, but instead he chose to murder the Master and frame him for it, thereby starting a war that killed unknown numbers of people.
I guess it depends on what kind of story they want to tell going forward.